Make this page my home page

  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Lion Apparel Introduces Flame-Resistant, ...

Tenn. volunteers go to court over planned double fire protection


Volunteer

Resources
Face the Facts - NVFC Heart-Healthy Firefighter Resource Guide STATter911.com Visit VolunteerFD.org for more tips and information for volunteer professionals
All Resources

Featured Product Categories
Nozzles Risk Assessment Software Wireless Communications CPR Rescue Stretchers
View All Categories

Volunteer Tips
Care tips for thermal burns patients Measures for a healthy heart Dangers in cellars
More tips
Videos
Retention and Recruitment in the Volunteer Fire and Emergency Services Putnam County Fire Recruit Video Volunteer Firefighter Tribute Death of a firefighter after 'party' Amity Fire Rescue
More Videos

Volunteer Article

Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This


Tenn. volunteers go to court over planned double fire protection

By Beverly A. Carroll
The Chattanooga Times Free Press (Tennessee)

RINGGOLD, Ga. — The plan for Ringgold volunteer firefighters to intercede in a lawsuit against county officials by other firefighter volunteers was delayed Wednesday because the judge was not in court.

Catoosa County is not delaying, though, in evaluating a piece of property in Lakeview on which to build a county fire station to protect residences now covered by Fort Oglethorpe and Post Volunteer firefighters.

The duplication of fire protection service is claimed to be illegal and a breach of contract in a lawsuit Post and Fort Oglethorpe filed in May, and Superior Court Judge Ralph Hill issued a restraining order halting the county plan.

He ordered mediation and has approved two extensions.

H.K. Sawyer, lawyer for Ringgold's volunteer firefighters, said Tuesday they want to join the complaint. He said county actions to hire paid fire crews and charter a new fire department are forcing out the veteran volunteers of the Catoosa County Fire & Rescue.

Mr. Sawyer said he planned to file papers with the court Wednesday, but he did not because Judge Hill was not in court.

He said his clients' claim is similar to that of the volunteers represented by the May 15 lawsuit.

"We are asking that Catoosa County be ordered not to waste taxpayers' money ... buying more property and building new buildings when the ones we have are perfectly adequate and the volunteers are more than adequate to protect against fires, as they have for more than 50 years," Mr. Sawyer said.

He said Wednesday he will file the complaint at a later date and that the action will ask the court to halt all county steps toward chartering a new fire department until the case is adjudicated.

Catoosa County Attorney Skip Patty said he's disappointed.

"We surely didn't intend for that to happen," Mr. Patty said. "The volunteers have provided valuable services to Catoosa County for years. We truly want them integrated into the county's department."

County commissioners last month voted to move ahead with establishing a new department and approved a new compensation package for volunteers that includes training and pension funding.

But volunteers said it requires them to sign up as if they are starting anew, and Mr. Sawyer said most will not join the new department.

Fort Oglethorpe interim City Manager Ron Goulart said both parties agreed Wednesday to continue with the status quo, and they tried to reach Judge Hill by phone to request another continuation through January.

"I feel comfortable, if parties are in agreement, that the judge is more likely than not to approve (the request)," Mr. Goulart said.

Mr. Patty said Wednesday that the county is evaluating a piece of Lakeview property for a fire station.

"Once we finish that, we think we will close on a tract that will be satisfactory," he said.

Copyright 2008 Chattanooga Publishing Company



LexisNexis Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.   Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy


Print Talk BackRegisterBookmarkRSSWhat's This

Member Comments: Submit Your Comment
FireRescue1 encourages its members to comment on this article in the comments section below. You must be a registered member of FireRescue1 to post a comment. The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of FireRescue1 or its staff.

Most Commented Articles
 1.  The Things I Carried
 2.  Federal high-visibility vest rule takes effect
 3.  Interior Use of Positive Pressure – Part 1
 4.  Vacant buildings boarded up after vagrants blamed in Va. fire
 5.  What's Going On Out There?
 6.  Fla. city settles suit with volunteer firefighters
 7.  Safety of Ohio firefighters put to test by area company
 8.  Ohio fire chief under investigation over alleged shoving
 9.  Mo. chief says FD conflict still about race
 10.  Heads bow in memory of 9/11 victims



Back to previous page